Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vocab namespaces section #198

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

stain
Copy link
Contributor

@stain stain commented Mar 29, 2016

This fixes #193 by adding explicit text to the 1.1 Namespaces section.

It also includes direct links to the OWL version of the ontology (depending on issue #66).

@azaroth42
Copy link
Collaborator

There's lots of changes in index-respec.html that don't seem to be reflected in index-linktemplate ?

@stain
Copy link
Contributor Author

stain commented Mar 29, 2016

I think that is because @iherman had edited index-linktempalte without regenarating index-respec.html

using
    python make_links.py

and then saving index-respec.html from Firefox to index.html
Also corrected editor draft and previous URLs
@stain
Copy link
Contributor Author

stain commented Mar 29, 2016

OK - now I did it in new commits - first a simple commit that just regenerates index-respec.html and index.html (lovely thing to have build artifacts in git, huh..) - and then added my 1.1 changes as a single commit.

@stain
Copy link
Contributor Author

stain commented Mar 29, 2016

BTW I added the index* regeneration (now that I think I get it) to the Makefile of the #188 pull request - it will ask you to save from the browser when index.html is out of dat.e

@stain
Copy link
Contributor Author

stain commented Mar 29, 2016

In commit b2c8323 @iherman said:

(I edited the nametemplate files and the index.html manually, did not bother with regeneration; wasn't even sure how to do that for the vocab file, there is no relevant README)

(I added such README.md to #188 )

So now his changes are reflected in my commit regenerating in d67c47d

(I edited this comment as I got it the wrong way around first)

@azaroth42
Copy link
Collaborator

These PRs are now very stale :( I think it's easier to generate an ontology from the vocab at this stage, to ensure that they're synchronized. So I'm closing these PRs, sorry!

@azaroth42 azaroth42 closed this May 23, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Resolving http and https namespaces
2 participants