Update template contents owner tests to match spec changes #624
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Critic review: https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/773 This is an external review system which you may optionally use for the code review of your pull request. In order to help critic track your changes, please do not make in-place history rewrites (e.g. via |
|
@Ms2ger Hi, is this something you could review? If not do you know who might? Thanks in advance. @hayatoito as an FYI in case you have an idea of a good contact point. |
|
@mrbkap, r? |
|
lgtm |
Ms2ger
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2014
Update template contents owner tests to match spec changes
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After w3c/html@57c545d, every template content DocumentFragment gets a new ownerDocument unless that template's ownerDocument was created for some other template (i.e., for another template in the same document or for a nested template).
See spec bug at https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23990 for more discussion of this change.