You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should we attempt to keep these sections in sync, or should we move most details out of §3. Dependencies? The Terms defined by reference section is generated automatically and should always cover all references to other Bikeshed-covered specs, but the Dependencies section needs to be maintained manually. Specs outside of Bikeshed coverage (CBOR, CDDL, etc.) would still need to be listed manually in §3 Dependencies, though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
§3. Dependencies states that
It also states, for example:
...but the Terms defined by reference section lists many more terms for most of these dependencies.
Should we attempt to keep these sections in sync, or should we move most details out of §3. Dependencies? The Terms defined by reference section is generated automatically and should always cover all references to other Bikeshed-covered specs, but the Dependencies section needs to be maintained manually. Specs outside of Bikeshed coverage (CBOR, CDDL, etc.) would still need to be listed manually in §3 Dependencies, though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: