New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a Terminology Section #50
Comments
Some quick thoughts: |
OpenID uses |
Also, "Authenticator" |
I took a first pass and made an initial list of terms. There are some generic terms we may not want to include, but since it's easier to cut I kept them anyway:
|
Sorry for the delay on this; it's taking a bit more time than I anticipated, so it ran into today. |
This is a first pass, placing the Terminology section just before Acknowledgements. I made a pass through, attempting to ensure the first use of a term within a given section was always linked back to the definition. I also made an effort to always spell out "WebAuthn Relying Party" for the first use in each section, and remove the use of "RP" (excepting the use of "RP ID"). There are some more whitespace cleanups as well, though I tried to minimize them.
This is a first pass, placing the Terminology section just before Acknowledgements. I made a pass through, attempting to ensure the first use of a term within a given section was always linked back to the definition. I also made an effort to always spell out "WebAuthn Relying Party" for the first use in each section, and remove the use of "RP" (excepting the use of "RP ID"). There are some more whitespace cleanups as well, though I tried to minimize them.
Closed by e3dc893; follow-ons to continue as needed. |
Some terms like
Relying Party
are known sources of confusion. We should add a terminology section to the specification that explains particular terms.If you have a known confusable term, please add a comment to this issue so I can pick those up, too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: