Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace obsolete RFC8152 with RFC9052 and RFC9053 #1804

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Oct 6, 2022
Merged

Conversation

emlun
Copy link
Member

@emlun emlun commented Sep 22, 2022

Fixes #1802.

The spec "CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)" [RFC8152] has been superseded and split into the two specs "CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Structures and Process" [RFC9052] and "CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Initial Algorithms" [RFC9053].

Summary of affected terms and references:

Before After
kty (RFC8152) kty (RFC9052)
crv (RFC8152) crv (RFC9053)
COSE key (RFC8152) COSE key (RFC9052)
Section 7 of [RFC8152] Section 7 of [RFC9052]
Section 8 of [RFC8152] Section 2 of [RFC9053]
Section 8.1 of [RFC8152] Section 2.1 of [RFC9053]
Section 13.1 of [RFC8152] Section 7.1 of [RFC9053]

Preview | Diff

The spec "CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)" [[RFC8152]] has been
superseded and split into the two specs "CBOR Object Signing and Encryption
(COSE): Structures and Process" [[RFC9052]] and "CBOR Object Signing and
Encryption (COSE): Initial Algorithms" [[RFC9053]].

Summary of affected terms and references:

| Before                                                                             | After                                                                                     |
|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| [kty](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8152#section-7.1) ([RFC8152])              | [kty](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9052#name-cose-key-common-parameters) ([RFC9052]) |
| [crv](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8152#section-13.1.1) ([RFC8152])           | [crv](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc9053#name-double-coordinate-curves) ([RFC9053])      |
| [COSE key](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8152#section-7) ([RFC8152][rfc8152])  | [COSE key](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc9052#name-key-objects) ([RFC9052])              |
| [Section 7](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8152#section-7) of [[RFC8152]]       | [Section 7](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9052#section-7) of [[RFC9052]]              |
| [Section 8](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8152#section-8) of [[RFC8152]]       | [Section 2](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9053#section-2) of [[RFC9053]]              |
| [Section 8.1](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8152#section-8.1) of [[RFC8152]]   | [Section 2.1](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9053#section-2.1) of [[RFC9053]]          |
| [Section 13.1](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8152#section-13.1) of [[RFC8152]] | [Section 7.1](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9053#section-7.1) of [[RFC9053]]          |

[rfc8152]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8152
[rfc9052]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9052
[rfc9053]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9053
@emlun emlun added this to the L3-WD-01 milestone Sep 22, 2022
@emlun emlun self-assigned this Sep 22, 2022
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@sbweeden sbweeden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks - this fixes the build.

@emlun emlun merged commit 008b979 into main Oct 6, 2022
@emlun emlun deleted the issue-1802-new-cose branch October 6, 2022 07:56
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2022
SHA: 008b979
Reason: push, by @emlun

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bikeshed build failing
3 participants