Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add registry refs and update associated text #192

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 7, 2016

Conversation

equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor

this fixes #127, #129, #155.

however, we have some impedance mismatch between how we've been intending to generate attestation format IDs, and extenstion IDs. This is not (yet) resolved in the spec text in this set of commits in this branch (see below) -- we should discuss and resolve and then merge, ok?

this PR depends on PR #191

@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH added this to the WD-02 milestone Sep 3, 2016
@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH self-assigned this Sep 3, 2016
@vijaybh
Copy link
Contributor

vijaybh commented Sep 7, 2016

Merging as per consensus on call.

@vijaybh vijaybh merged commit b695628 into master Sep 7, 2016
@vijaybh vijaybh deleted the jeffh-add-registry-refs-155 branch September 7, 2016 18:21
@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH restored the jeffh-add-registry-refs-155 branch September 12, 2016 23:50
@vijaybh vijaybh deleted the jeffh-add-registry-refs-155 branch September 13, 2016 06:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Attestation format identifiers lack formal definition and matching rules
2 participants