not in the same tree: use node document over ownerDocument attribute #1074
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
To avoid shadowing attributes set in the DOM, we should rely on the algorithmic definitions of ownerDocument, which is node document, from the DOM specificaiton. This patch also removes the third step as the otherwise-clause needs to be part of the same step as the if-condition.
AutomatedTester
approved these changes
Aug 30, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To avoid shadowing attributes set in the DOM, we should rely on the
algorithmic definitions of ownerDocument, which is node document, from
the DOM specificaiton.
This patch also removes the third step as the otherwise-clause needs to
be part of the same step as the if-condition.
This change is