refer to specific versions of IL-RFCs #246
Conversation
| "Evan Schwartz", | ||
| "Stefan Thomas", | ||
| "Ben Sharafian" | ||
| "Interledger Community" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
would this not be the publisher instead of the author?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@michielbdejong since we have not tracked the editors on these docs directly I have used the committers as the authors list
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you have to name individual community members, then looking at https://github.com/interledger/rfcs/commits/master/0003-interledger-protocol/0003-interledger-protocol.md, for e.g. IL-RFC-3 they would be, in reverse chronological order, Stefan, me, Jason, Andrew, you, Sylvain, and Evan (not Ben).
For IL-RFC-15, looking at https://github.com/interledger/rfcs/commits/master/0015-ilp-addresses/0015-ilp-addresses.md, it would be (again in reverse chronological order): me, you, and Rome (not Stefan, not Evan).
For IL-RFC-26 you would need to look at https://github.com/interledger/rfcs/commits/master/0026-payment-pointers/0026-payment-pointers.md - it would be just you and not Ben.
So which committers did you look at, @adrianhopebailie? I get at least different results than you did. And even then, I think we should not pretend that Interledger was "authored" by whoever updates the RFCs, it sidelines a lot of other people, and doesn't do right to our community spirit?
@marcoscaceres Is it a hard requirement of w3c documents that references name a list of specific humans as authors? Can this document not reference any community-authored documents, in the way I proposed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@michielbdejong as I said, this may be wrong as I haven't updated those for some time.
And even then, I think we should not pretend that Interledger was "authored" by whoever updates the RFCs, it sidelines a lot of other people, and doesn't do right to our community spirit?
I agree with this sentiment, I hadn't really thought about it that way when the committers list was still small.
Let me investigate some options
| @@ -28,39 +28,33 @@ | |||
| localBiblio: { | |||
| "interledger-protocol": { | |||
| title: "The Interledger Protocol" | |||
| , href: "https://interledger.org/rfcs/0003-interledger-protocol/" | |||
| , href: "https://interledger.org/rfcs/0003-interledger-protocol/draft-9.html" | |||
| ] | ||
| , status: "Interledger RFC" | ||
| }, | ||
| "interledger-addresses": { | ||
| title: "Interledger Addresses" | ||
| , href: "https://interledger.org/rfcs/0015-ilp-addresses/" | ||
| , href: "https://interledger.org/rfcs/0015-ilp-addresses/draft-2.html" |
| ] | ||
| , status: "Interledger RFC" | ||
| }, | ||
| "payment-pointers": { | ||
| title: "Payment Pointers" | ||
| , href: "https://interledger.org/rfcs/0026-payment-pointers/" | ||
| , href: "https://interledger.org/rfcs/0026-payment-pointers/draft-1.html" |
| ] | ||
| , status: "Interledger RFC" | ||
| }, | ||
| "simple-payment-setup-protocol": { | ||
| title: "Simple Payment Setup Protocol" | ||
| , href: "https://interledger.org/rfcs/0009-simple-payment-setup-protocol/" | ||
| , href: "https://interledger.org/rfcs/0009-simple-payment-setup-protocol/draft-3.html" |
|
@michielbdejong this PR will be unnecessary once tobie/specref#436 is merged as I will remove the |
Continuation of w3c/webpayments#246
|
Continued in interledger/specref#1 |
No description provided.