Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

When to start work on WebRTC 2.0 #43

Closed
michaelchampion opened this issue Apr 1, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

When to start work on WebRTC 2.0 #43

michaelchampion opened this issue Apr 1, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@michaelchampion
Copy link

WebRTC 1.0 is now at CR, which was the defined trigger for starting work on 2.0 in the previous charter. Nevertheless, implementation of the specification is still in its early stages. Although Microsoft has long advocated the object-focused approach, at this particular juncture we question whether it is advisable to start standardization of a 2.0 object model before the 1.0 object model has been implemented.
Delaying formal work 2.0 in the WG until the WebRTC 1.0 object model's "deployment blocking" Issues have been addressed would be more efficient. We hope this will happen by the time the 1.0 CR "recycles", but this is a technical condition, not a process milestone.

@alvestrand
Copy link
Contributor

Do you have a particular list of issues that you want to get tagged as "deployment blocking"?
Now that we can retire the "CR blocker" label, we can start on new labelling.

@aboba
Copy link
Contributor

aboba commented Apr 10, 2018

We can add the "Deployment blocking" label.

aboba added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2018
@alvestrand alvestrand assigned alvestrand and unassigned aboba Apr 17, 2018
@alvestrand
Copy link
Contributor

Looking at the current charter text, I see that we already have

"The highest priority of the group in this charter period will be to get the core recommendations progressed towards Recommendation status. "

I think this sufficiently addresses the issue.
The resources that are willing to spend time on 1.0 progression and teh resources that are willing to spend time on object model proposals have overlaps, but it's not the same persons.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants