Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WebRTC spec should explicitly specify all causes of a PeerConnection-sourced track being muted #139

Closed
dontcallmedom opened this issue Dec 15, 2014 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member

Originally reported on W3C Bugzilla ISSUE-25513 Wed, 30 Apr 2014 07:12:28 GMT
Reported by Kiran
Assigned to

As discussed in Bug 25361 [1], WebRTC spec should explicitly specify all the muted events of a MediaStramTrack related to RTCPeerConnection

  1. Tracks sourced from m-mline and marked as RecvOnly in SDP should be considered muted tracks.
  2. Muted state resulted due to doohickey actions.

// May be some more other events related to PeerConnection.

[1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25361

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member Author

Original comment by Harald Alvestrand on W3C Bugzilla. Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:45:51 GMT

Editorial.

Note: Influenced by RTPSender/RTPReceiver.

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member Author

Original comment by Harald Alvestrand on W3C Bugzilla. Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:00:55 GMT

Note: The spec currently says that newly created MediaStreamTracks sourced from a PeerConnection have muted=true, but doesn't have any line in them saying that they set muted=false (and trigger onunmute) when media arrives.

This should be fixed in the same pass.

@alvestrand alvestrand added the bug label Apr 16, 2015
alvestrand added a commit that referenced this issue May 21, 2015
Clarify muted state (proposed fix for issue #139)
@stefhak
Copy link
Contributor

stefhak commented Jun 8, 2015

Closing since #220 has been merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants