-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Valid RID values mismatch between specs #2013
Comments
I would assume that IETF takes precedence, but i also found inconsistency in ietf. That draft has expired, but i haven't found a newer version. |
also found some firefox examples in related simulcast issues that show rids 'hi', 'mid', 'low' so we should make sure not to restrict to anything less than 3 characters. |
What's the effective rid length limit here now? We're trying to fix web-platform-tests/wptwebrtc/RTCPeerConnection-addTransceiver.https.html which still says 16 bytes. |
i think it needs to fit in a header extension, so i believe 16 is the right number. |
@amithilbuch Thanks, can you help me locate the spec support for that? Just making sure I'm not missing it. |
we've actually decided not to formally specify it and refer to the specification in ietf.
it's out of date and might need a revision because it currently indicates a single character. |
That's a normative reference, so that seems problematic if we want to allow 3 or even 16 characters. Do we need to open an issue? |
@jan-ivar can you ask Mr. Roach what the original intent was? and if an upcoming draft is due that addresses this? if not, then i guess we should file an issue on the ietf spec. |
@adamroach thoughts? |
According to WebRTC's addTransceiver(), the RID format is:
But according to https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-rid-15 , we have:
Which is correct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: