New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add languages on how to choose IP addresses. #444
Conversation
@@ -7698,7 +7698,9 @@ <h3 id="sec.identity-verify-assertion">Verifying Identity Assertions</h3> | |||
session.</p> | |||
|
|||
<p>Revealing IP addresses can leak location and means of | |||
connection; this can be sensitive.</p> | |||
connection; this can be sensitive but necessary for establishing peer to | |||
peer connections. The choice of which addresses to expose is controlled by |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make sense to change "which addresses to expose" into "which addresses to expose and when to expose them"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would "is determined by" be more accurate than "is controlled by"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PTAL.
Thanks,
Guowei
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Peter Thatcher notifications@github.com
wrote:
In webrtc.html
#444 (comment):@@ -7698,7 +7698,9 @@
Verifying Identity Assertions
session.<p>Revealing IP addresses can leak location and means of
- connection; this can be sensitive.
- connection; this can be sensitive but necessary for establishing peer to
- peer connections. The choice of which addresses to expose is controlled by
Would "is determined by" be more accurate than "is controlled by"?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/444/files#r48512623.
Thanks - this is also covered in #439 - @dontcallmedom and @guoweis - please make sure language is compatible;M it would be nice to merge this only once. |
I see that dontcallmedom's write up has covered what I intended to say. I Thanks, On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Harald Alvestrand <notifications@github.com
|
This is a dup with #439 |
No description provided.