Refine spec concepts, terminology, prose, definitions, and algorithms. #87
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @michaelwasserman!
I approve this PR with my Second Screen WG chair hat on. I'm not conducting a line-by-line review but the question I'm considering is:
"Does this spec satisfy the technical requirement expected of a W3C Working Group deliverable?"
My assessment is this spec meets or exceeds those requirements. This update further improves the spec by aligning it with established conventions. In particular I'm happy to see both security and privacy considerations carefully written down.
I think this spec is almost First Public Working Draft ready. The revised WG charter is currently in AC review, and if the review completes without objections and with adequate support I'm projecting we can bring this work to the WG end of Q1 or early Q2 to continue refine it further with more contributors and wider review.
Co-authored-by: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the suggestions, @tomayac! I'm commenting to modify some of your suggestions.
Co-authored-by: Reilly Grant <reillyeon@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for the feedback, @reillyeon!
I applied your suggestions and offered my own to address your other comments here. I'll apply those and merge the PR momentarily. I'm happy to follow up with any additional feedback in subsequent PRs.
#87) SHA: dcf7c28 Reason: push, by @michaelwasserman Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
w3c#87) * Make substantial refinements to the spec Co-authored-by: Mike Wasserman <msw@chromium.org> Co-authored-by: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com> Co-authored-by: Reilly Grant <reillyeon@users.noreply.github.com>
w3c#87) * Make substantial refinements to the spec Co-authored-by: Mike Wasserman <msw@chromium.org> Co-authored-by: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com> Co-authored-by: Reilly Grant <reillyeon@users.noreply.github.com>
Hey @reillyeon, please excuse the size of this change and take a look; thanks!
I tried to incorporate first pass changes to address your last round of feedback and #79, #80, and #81.
FYI @tomayac, @anssiko, @pwnall, @inexorabletash, @quisquous for highly optional review. Your feedback would be appreciated, but please don't feel obligated. thanks!
Preview | Diff