Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integration Patterns #9

Closed
mkovatsc opened this issue Aug 7, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Integration Patterns #9

mkovatsc opened this issue Aug 7, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@mkovatsc
Copy link
Contributor

mkovatsc commented Aug 7, 2017

There was a lot of feedback that the Integration Patterns were helpful to people. Mozilla created a somewhat cleaner image.

I also think it is useful and we should include it in the architecture, probably in the beginning before the Servient architecture. However, we should remove the "thing-to-cloud" focus, as we also need local connectivity (or "edge connectivity").

I will try to come up with figure. Can we add such a "Integration Patterns" section?

@mmccool
Copy link
Contributor

mmccool commented Aug 9, 2017

I think this makes sense. The use cases given are very specific, I think it would be useful to talk about some small number of patterns and then define the use cases in terms of those patterns.

I think it would also be useful to give a more complex use case that combines multiple patterns (eg both local and remote access). We probably also want to say something about robustness when external internet connectivity is intermittent (that could be used to motivate the "shadow" pattern).

@mlagally
Copy link
Contributor

Arch call on 13.2.:
It would be nice to have a similar image in the introduction.

mlagally added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2019
@mkovatsc
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkovatsc commented May 9, 2019

Was only "nice to have". Closing.

@mkovatsc mkovatsc closed this as completed May 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants