Specifying terms influenced by different bindings

[egekorkan]

fixes #218

---

Preview | Diff

[egekorkan]

Call of 15.03:

• How to validate the URI Scheme Usage: See (https://w3c.github.io/wot-binding-templates/bindings/protocols/modbus/index.html#abnf , URI Scheme requirements in JSON Schemas #245).

• ABNF parsers in Consumer would be too much but for implementors would be good.

• We need to explain how Consumers should identify the protocol from the URI.

• Term and keyword are used interchangeably

• Assignment should be changed to something like "Subspecification MUST specify"

• The content of the tables seems to be ok.

[egekorkan]

@danielpeintner you had mentioned that "Assignment" was confusing. I have changed it now to Specification Requirement and added a sentence that explains these.

[relu91]

@egekorkan is this ready to review or do you need to close the points defined in #263 (comment) ?

[egekorkan]

@egekorkan is this ready to review or do you need to close the points defined in #263 (comment) ?

It is ready to review. How to pick the correct binding via the URI scheme needs another PR

[egekorkan]

Call of 22.03, no objections, merging.