Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Split Data Model constraints and bindings #4

Closed
danielpeintner opened this issue Aug 29, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Split Data Model constraints and bindings #4

danielpeintner opened this issue Aug 29, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
requirement

Comments

@danielpeintner
Copy link
Contributor

I think "Data Model constraints" can be used in other bindings than HTTP also.

Hence I propose splitting the two approaches.
@danielpeintner danielpeintner mentioned this issue Aug 29, 2019
Closed
@benfrancis benfrancis mentioned this issue Sep 2, 2019
Closed
@mlagally
Copy link
Contributor

Excellent point - see the discussion in #8 (comment)

@mlagally
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is addressed by making the HTTP binding one of many possible protocol bindings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
requirement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@danielpeintner @mlagally