Rename HTTP Baseline Profile to HTTP Basic Profile

[benfrancis]

This is a follow-up to #260 which proposes renaming the "HTTP Baseline Profile" to the "HTTP Basic Profile".

The reason for this is that I think after the re-structure in #260 there's potential for confusion between the terms "Baseline Profile" and "Common Constraints". The term "baseline" may imply that all other HTTP profiles all have to be built on top of the HTTP Baseline profile, which is not the case since they can also be used on their own. This addresses similar historical concerns about the the term "Core Profile" (#5, #21).

Note that this PR builds on #260, so please only review the last commit 2bf7a55

---

Preview | Diff

[mlagally]

The name change is an improvement and should be also done in the diagrams, both in profile and architecture.

However this MR also contains many unrelated changes, presumably you branched from a different branch. Can you please constrain the scope of this MR to the name change only.

[benfrancis]

However this MR also contains many unrelated changes, presumably you branched from a different branch. Can you please constrain the scope of this MR to the name change only.

Please read my comment from above:

Note that this PR builds on #260, so please only review the last commit 2bf7a55

This PR depends on #260 because the name change is largely motivated by the re-structure proposed in that PR. I can rebase this PR once if and when that one lands.

[benfrancis]

This PR depends on #260 because the name change is largely motivated by the re-structure proposed in that PR. I can rebase this PR once if and when that one lands.

This has now been done so this change can be reviewed on its own.

should be also done in the diagrams, both in profile and architecture.

Hopefully this can be done as a follow-up as I can't find the source code of the diagrams concerned.

[mlagally]

Thanks @benfrancis - I consider this ready to merge.

The diagram source for the sequence diagram is at: "images/Sequence Diagram - WebHook.puml"
You can use Plantuml to render the diagram.
The other diagrams are completely outdated and were drawn in Powerpoint.
It would be easier to recreate them in Draw, after we have consolidated the spec.

[mlagally]

Profile call on Sept 21. - Agree to merge after the merge conflict has been resolved.
Please create another issue for the diagram(s)

[benfrancis]

@mlagally I have resolved the merge conflict and I believe this is now ready to merge.

I have filed #290 to follow up on updating Figure 1.

[benfrancis]

@mlagally I would be grateful if you could land this PR ASAP so that I have an opportunity to resolve any resulting merge conflicts in my other 9 PRs before tomorrow's meeting, so the same thing doesn't happen again. Thank you.