Add table numbers and captions using new respec option v.2

[relu91]

This PR contains the changes of #1712 with an additional commit to fix the renderer. The history was a little messed up so I pointed directly to the main branch.

fixes #1256

---

Preview | Diff

[danielpeintner]

No review, just a comment/question.

I can see the table numbering where there wasn't anything before.
e.g., in 4. Namespaces 👍

Unfortunately I cannot click on it nor is there an ID generated so that I can point people to a specific table like
#id-of-my-table-about-X

Do you think this is possible also since it would be very useful.

[danielpeintner]

Note: There is an id, see
https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/relu91/wot-thing-description/pull/1772.html#table-namespaces-used-in-tds

Unfortunately one needs to look into the HTML source code since the Table header is not clickable like examples or so.

[relu91]

Note: There is an id, see https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/relu91/wot-thing-description/pull/1772.html#table-namespaces-used-in-tds

Unfortunately one needs to look into the HTML source code since the Table header is not clickable like for examples or so.

Good point I'll try to add it.

[relu91]

@danielpeintner unfortunately there is no built-in way to make the Table n° clickable: respec controls the generation of the caption label. However, in 180da57 I made the whole caption a link. What do you think? I'd be happier if I could add the link only in the Table n° but this way might still work.

Note: the other table captions need to be updated too.

[danielpeintner]

There does not seem to be any link for some tables (Table 1 and 2)?
https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/relu91/wot-thing-description/pull/1772.html#table-namespaces-used-in-tds

I see that for Table 3 there is a link...
see https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/relu91/wot-thing-description/pull/1772.html#table-vocabulary-terms-in-thing-level

EDIT: I think changing just some was intentional, right @relu91 ?

BTW, there is an open feature request: w3c/respec#4222 and maybe we just need to wait...

[relu91]

EDIT: I think changing just some was intentional, right @relu91 ?

Yes it was, I just didn't want to change all if you don't decide to go in that direction

BTW, there is an open feature request: w3c/respec#4222 and maybe we just need to wait...

Ah cool, somehow I missed it. Let's decide int today's call.

[egekorkan]

Call of 22.02: We will wait for respec to have the automatic links otherwise the manual part can be done.

[relu91]

PR in flight: w3c/respec#4392

[relu91]

PR in flight: w3c/respec#4392

PR merged, release should be done soon.

[egekorkan]

@relu91 given that the release has also happened, what should we do with this PR?

[relu91]

ready to be merged 👍🏻

[egekorkan]

Call of 22.03: No objections, merging since it is an informative change.