Add a section about preferring algorithmic steps and state, or other more readable formal concepts that decompose to them. #109
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…more readable formal concepts that decompose to them. This also expands the section on specification writing advice to include a substantive section, rather than being only links to other resources. Fixes w3ctag#10.
travisleithead
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2018
cynthia
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2018
annevk
reviewed
Oct 30, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a section about preferring algorithmic steps and state, or other more readable formal concepts that decompose to them more readable formal concepts that decompose to them.
This also expands the section on specification writing advice to include
a substantive section, rather than being only links to other resources.
Fixes #10.
Note that this is a first shot at this, and I'm expecting substantive comments. I think @domenic and @annevk and @tabatkins might be particularly interested.