Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resource Timing #641

Closed
caribouW3 opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Resource Timing #641

caribouW3 opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@caribouW3
Copy link

Ya ya yawm TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of Resource Timing.

This is actually a request to confirm or amend previous review, as requested in the CR transition
w3c/transitions#337 (comment)

This specification was originally developed in levels, Level 1 has been a CR for a long time,
Level 2 has had a wide review draft in 2017.

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):

🐛 open issues in our GitHub repo for each point of feedback

💬 leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [github usernames]

Thank you!

@torgo
Copy link
Member

torgo commented Jun 29, 2021

Hi @caribouW3 can you please give us a bit more context on this review - specifically you mention that there have been "recent additions" that would require a re-review but can you please be specific about what those additions are and what kind of feedback you're seeking from the TAG on these?

@caribouW3
Copy link
Author

Hi,
Apart from some editorial work and minor tweaks, I suppose the most interesting part for this TAG review would be in section 4.5 Cross-Origin Resources.

@cynthia
Copy link
Member

cynthia commented Sep 14, 2021

@kenchris and I discussed this today in our VF2F and we are happy with the changes. (Given that it is only 4.5 that changed) Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

@cynthia cynthia closed this as completed Sep 14, 2021
@torgo torgo added the Resolution: satisfied The TAG is satisfied with this design label Sep 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants