Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request for TAG review of CSS Timing Functions spec #161

Closed
1 of 3 tasks
suzyh opened this issue Mar 24, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed
1 of 3 tasks

Request for TAG review of CSS Timing Functions spec #161

suzyh opened this issue Mar 24, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@suzyh
Copy link

suzyh commented Mar 24, 2017

Hello TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of:

Further details (optional):

You should also know that...
I am not actually involved in writing this spec, so can't really give much useful info here. My understanding is that this spec grew out of animations and transitions, but some parts of it (particularly the frames timing function) are new.

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):

  • open issues in our Github repo for each point of feedback
  • open a single issue in our Github repo for the entire review
  • leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [github usernames]
@torgo torgo added this to the tag-f2f-tokyo-2017-04-27 milestone Apr 27, 2017
@dbaron
Copy link
Member

dbaron commented Apr 27, 2017

This was just split out of transitions; the only new thing is frames(). I think everything else has been shipping for half a decade.

@dbaron
Copy link
Member

dbaron commented Apr 27, 2017

/cc @birtles @shans.

The TAG has been talking about this, and there seems to be a bit of concern about the frames() name given the other uses of the term, e.g., in requestAnimationFrame and frames as produced for the screen, and also @keyframes.

We're wondering if there are other naming options, and would like to ask the CSS WG to reconsider the name if that's possible.

Thanks for bringing this up for review!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants