You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Especially now that tagging involved a new wrapper type, rather than meta-data, it's gotten a bit intrusive.
With a little more declaration in the schema, we could relate a GraphQL object type to a Clojure record type (or even Java class).
This would allow Lacinia to inuit the object type when dealing with a union or interface type.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hlship
changed the title
Define a record type as an alternative to tagging
Define a record type and mapping to schema type, as an alternative to tagging
May 30, 2017
Especially now that tagging involved a new wrapper type, rather than meta-data, it's gotten a bit intrusive.
With a little more declaration in the schema, we could relate a GraphQL object type to a Clojure record type (or even Java class).
This would allow Lacinia to inuit the object type when dealing with a union or interface type.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: