You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm interested in fitting wasmi into small embedded applications, with footprints in the 32k-64k range. Currently, aggressively optimizing wasmi generates binaries in the 300-400k range. Would you be interested in taking patches that further reduce the size of the wasmi crate?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That sounds like a really interesting use-case! I'd be down to accept patches, but only if they don't pessimise the general use case and don't add too much complexity!
I'm interested in fitting wasmi into small embedded applications, with footprints in the 32k-64k range. Currently, aggressively optimizing wasmi generates binaries in the 300-400k range. Would you be interested in taking patches that further reduce the size of the wasmi crate?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: