-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Collect the initial set of requirements #1
Comments
For fast rendering, how about using different implementation depend on the density of the data? |
Here are some thoughts from my side:
|
I have some idea (if i can add):
those feature are not what i expect from a MVP, but I toss the bone.. maybe someone bites :) If i can add some of my though: My user-case for using Zoom would be in a CI settings. I wold like to run unit-test on gitlab runners and if they fail, a way to show the result via web-browser. |
Big +1 for extensibility via plugins. Maybe there is a need to separate Github issue for discussing plugins idea. From there we can conclude the core features that need to be implemented. I think we need to address 3 things: architecture, core features, and the common use-cases (for plugins).
|
I'm not sure if I'd call these requirements, but if we are brainstorming on ideas for features, here are some ideas.
|
It would be nice to have a "phantom" wave which is an overlay on named traces. It could be used to compare captured traces to configured timings (from datasheet / mock) to highlight errors. This could be used complementary with #10. Maybe as plugin? |
@fusedFET verification by using waveform compares is not a good approach. It has a lot of disadvantages. |
@Paebbels Sure, but it has a high didactic value for beginners and also is a very useful tool in some situation. |
A general task to collect the initial set of ideas, requirements that need to address one or more of initial goals:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: