Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: add security check workflow #732

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 26, 2024
Merged

ci: add security check workflow #732

merged 9 commits into from
May 26, 2024

Conversation

lotyp
Copy link
Member

@lotyp lotyp commented May 24, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced security analysis and static analysis workflows in GitHub Actions.
  • Updates

    • Updated GitHub Actions workflows to latest versions for better performance and security.
    • Modified composer.json to update dependencies and specify PHP version 8.2.19.
    • Updated Docker image version in docker-compose.yaml for the app service.
  • Improvements

    • Removed unused parameters and adjusted settings in phpstan.neon.dist for cleaner configuration.

Copy link

vercel bot commented May 24, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
laravel-cycle-orm-adapter ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 26, 2024 10:37am

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 24, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@lotyp has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 35 minutes and 33 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ffa4ae1 and c35d151.

Walkthrough

This update introduces new GitHub Actions workflows for security and static analysis, and updates existing workflows to use newer versions of their respective actions. Additionally, it modifies the composer.json and docker-compose.yaml files to update dependencies and PHP versions.

Changes

Files/Paths Change Summary
.github/workflows/security-analysis.yml, .github/workflows/static-analysis.yml Introduced new workflows for security and static analysis.
.github/workflows/apply-labels.yml, .github/workflows/shellcheck.yml Updated to use version v3.1.0 for the respective GitHub Actions workflows.
.github/workflows/create-release.yml Updated release-please-action from v4 to v4.1.1.
composer.json Removed version field, updated dependencies, added platform field for PHP 8.2.19.
docker-compose.yaml Changed Docker image version for app service from 8.3 to 8.2.
phpstan.neon.dist Removed checkMissingIterableValueType parameter, adjusted indentation for other parameters.

Possibly related issues

  • Dependency Dashboard #127: This issue involves dependency updates which align with the changes in composer.json and GitHub Actions workflows.

Poem

In the code's vast, intricate maze,
New workflows rise, a security phase.
Dependencies shift, versions align,
Docker's set to a PHP design.
With static checks and labels anew,
Our code grows stronger, thanks to you! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to full the review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added type: maintenance For maintenance, refactor and testing (perf, chore, style, revert, refactor, test, build, ci) type: enhancement For features and enhancements (feat) labels May 24, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.94%. Comparing base (ca5a6fb) to head (a2d58b5).

Current head a2d58b5 differs from pull request most recent head c35d151

Please upload reports for the commit c35d151 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #732   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     75.94%   75.94%           
  Complexity      252      252           
=========================================
  Files            46       46           
  Lines           927      927           
=========================================
  Hits            704      704           
  Misses          223      223           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ca5a6fb and a2d58b5.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/security-analysis.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/security-analysis.yml (5)

3-3: Ensure the workflow name is descriptive and aligns with its function.


41-41: Ensure strict validation of composer.json and composer.lock aligns with project requirements.


59-59: Confirm that composer audit covers all necessary security checks.


50-50: Validate the cache key format to ensure efficient caching and cache restoration.


11-11: Consider increasing the timeout if security scans are expected to take longer.

Verification successful

The average runtime of the recent security scans is approximately 0.3 minutes, which is significantly less than the current timeout setting of 4 minutes. Therefore, the current timeout setting is more than adequate for the security scans.

  • : The current timeout setting of 4 minutes is sufficient for the security scans, as the average runtime is approximately 0.3 minutes.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check average runtime of security scans to validate if the timeout setting is adequate.

# Test: Fetch recent workflow runs and calculate average runtime.
gh run list --workflow=security-analysis.yml --limit 10 --json createdAt,durationMinutes --jq '.[] | .durationMinutes'

Length of output: 351



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check average runtime of security scans to validate if the timeout setting is adequate.

# Test: Fetch recent workflow runs and calculate average runtime.
gh run list --workflow=security-analysis.yml --limit 10 --json createdAt,updatedAt --jq '.[] | .createdAt + " " + .updatedAt' | \
awk '{cmd="date -d "$2" +%s"; cmd | getline end; close(cmd); cmd="date -d "$1" +%s"; cmd | getline start; close(cmd); print (end - start) / 60}'

Length of output: 287

uses: shivammathur/setup-php@2.30.4
with:
php-version: ${{ matrix.php-version }}
extensions: none, ctype, dom, json, mbstring, simplexml, tokenizer, xml, xmlwriter, pdo
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The verification script has identified the usage of the tokenizer and json PHP extensions within the project. However, there was no evidence found for the usage of the other extensions (ctype, dom, mbstring, simplexml, xml, xmlwriter, pdo).

To optimize setup time, consider reviewing the necessity of the following PHP extensions:

  • ctype
  • dom
  • mbstring
  • simplexml
  • xml
  • xmlwriter
  • pdo

These extensions were not found in the current codebase and might be unnecessary.

Analysis chain

Review the necessity of each PHP extension to optimize setup time.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of each PHP extension listed.

# Test: Check if all listed PHP extensions are used in the project.
ast-grep --lang php --pattern $'extension_loaded("$_")' | grep -E 'none|ctype|dom|json|mbstring|simplexml|tokenizer|xml|xmlwriter|pdo'

Length of output: 242



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the necessity of each PHP extension listed.

# Test: Check if all listed PHP extensions are used in the project.
extensions="ctype|dom|json|mbstring|simplexml|tokenizer|xml|xmlwriter|pdo"
grep -rE --include="*.php" "($extensions)" .

Length of output: 5102

jobs:
security-analysis:
timeout-minutes: 4
runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The matrix strategy in the security-analysis.yml file currently includes only ubuntu-latest. It does not include ubuntu-22.04, which is used in the ci.yml workflow.

  • .github/workflows/security-analysis.yml:

    matrix:
      os:
        - ubuntu-latest
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml:

    os: ["ubuntu-22.04"]

To ensure consistency and coverage, consider adding ubuntu-22.04 to the matrix strategy in the security-analysis.yml file.

Analysis chain

Ensure that the matrix strategy includes all necessary operating systems.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all necessary operating systems are included in the matrix strategy.

# Test: List all operating systems used in other workflows to compare.
rg 'os:' .github/workflows/*.yml

Length of output: 508



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the matrix strategy from security-analysis.yml to verify the included operating systems.

# Test: Extract the matrix strategy from the security-analysis.yml file.
rg 'matrix:' -A 10 .github/workflows/security-analysis.yml

Length of output: 280

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a2d58b5 and edeb618.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • composer.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/security-analysis.yml (1 hunks)
  • composer.json (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • composer.json
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/security-analysis.yml

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between edeb618 and 7e95833.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • composer.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (7)
  • .github/workflows/apply-labels.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/create-release.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/shellcheck.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/static-analysis.yml (1 hunks)
  • composer.json (5 hunks)
  • docker-compose.yaml (1 hunks)
  • phpstan.neon.dist (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
  • .github/workflows/apply-labels.yml
  • .github/workflows/create-release.yml
  • .github/workflows/shellcheck.yml
  • .github/workflows/static-analysis.yml
  • docker-compose.yaml
  • phpstan.neon.dist
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • composer.json

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7e95833 and 88091af.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • composer.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/security-analysis.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/static-analysis.yml (1 hunks)
  • composer.json (7 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • .github/workflows/security-analysis.yml
  • .github/workflows/static-analysis.yml
  • composer.json

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 88091af and ffa4ae1.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • composer.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/security-analysis.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/static-analysis.yml (1 hunks)
  • composer.json (7 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • .github/workflows/security-analysis.yml
  • .github/workflows/static-analysis.yml
  • composer.json

@lotyp lotyp merged commit d5ac074 into master May 26, 2024
7 checks passed
@lotyp lotyp deleted the feat/infra-dx branch May 26, 2024 10:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement For features and enhancements (feat) type: maintenance For maintenance, refactor and testing (perf, chore, style, revert, refactor, test, build, ci)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant