Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix sortBy/sortByKey ascending param #33

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 22, 2018

Conversation

jcollado
Copy link
Contributor

While comparing the output from pyspark with the one from dummy_spark, I've realized that sortBy and sortByKey don't use the ascending parameter as expected. This PR fixes the situation and adds test cases as an example of the expected behavior.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.6%) to 79.936% when pulling fde2854 on jcollado:fix-sort-ascending-param into b6f3a38 on wdm0006:master.

3 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.6%) to 79.936% when pulling fde2854 on jcollado:fix-sort-ascending-param into b6f3a38 on wdm0006:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.6%) to 79.936% when pulling fde2854 on jcollado:fix-sort-ascending-param into b6f3a38 on wdm0006:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.6%) to 79.936% when pulling fde2854 on jcollado:fix-sort-ascending-param into b6f3a38 on wdm0006:master.

@jcollado
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wdm0006 Please let me know if you have any comment. Thanks.

@wdm0006
Copy link
Owner

wdm0006 commented Mar 22, 2018

Hey @jcollado, sorry, just missed this. Looks good to merge.

@wdm0006 wdm0006 merged commit d66c304 into wdm0006:master Mar 22, 2018
@jcollado jcollado deleted the fix-sort-ascending-param branch March 22, 2018 20:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants