add tenant as an optional param to batch.delete_objects

[ciprianaradulescu]

Fix for #374

[dirkkul]

Hi @ciprianaradulescu ,

thank you for your contribution! Could you add a test under integration/test_batch.py? You could just extend test_add_object_batch_with_tenant

[ciprianaradulescu]

Hello @dirkkul ,

I've extended test_add_object_batch_with_tenant to check for both a valid and an invalid batch delete based on the tenant. Please let me know if it looks ok.

Thank you !

[weaviate-git-bot]

To avoid any confusion in the future about your contribution to Weaviate, we work with a Contributor License Agreement. If you agree, you can simply add a comment to this PR that you agree with the CLA so that we can merge.

beep boop - the Weaviate bot 👋🤖

PS:
Are you already a member of the Weaviate Slack channel?

[ciprianaradulescu]

I agree with the CLA.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 95.49% and project coverage change: -0.21 ⚠️

Comparison is base (2d3dd56) 95.63% compared to head (eb3bf16) 95.43%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #375      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.63%   95.43%   -0.21%     
==========================================
  Files          64       64              
  Lines        7836     8165     +329     
==========================================
+ Hits         7494     7792     +298     
- Misses        342      373      +31     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
integration/test_grcp.py	98.59% <ø> (ø)
test/batch/test_crud_batch.py	99.22% <ø> (ø)
test/cluster/test_cluster.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
test/data/test_crud_data.py	99.23% <ø> (ø)
weaviate/gql/filter.py	94.34% <ø> (ø)
weaviate/schema/validate_schema.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
weaviate/warnings.py	89.36% <66.66%> (-8.37%)	⬇️
weaviate/connect/connection.py	88.93% <72.72%> (-1.24%)	⬇️
weaviate/schema/crud_schema.py	78.15% <72.72%> (-1.28%)	⬇️
weaviate/batch/crud_batch.py	95.32% <85.71%> (+2.78%)	⬆️
... and 18 more

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[dirkkul]

Hi @ciprianaradulescu, thank you, test looks good! Could you let black run over your code? The contributing guide shows how to do it.

I'll merge afterwards

[ciprianaradulescu]

Yeah, sorry, missed that 😁 Should be fine now.