Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Adding a CodingConventions.md file for Resource Timing
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
In crbug.com/1171767 we're hoping to clean up and reorganize the
Resource Timing WPT suite. Part of the cleanup is to adopt a consistent
coding style.

This change adds a markdown file with our style recommendations to the
suite itself so future developers can reference it.

Bug: 1171767
GithubIssue: w3c/resource-timing#254
Change-Id: I8d54fe74418808e82b524cbf5bcb5ef18c65a4df
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2686434
Commit-Queue: Tom McKee <tommckee@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yoav Weiss <yoavweiss@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolás Peña Moreno <npm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#853120}
  • Loading branch information
tommckee1 authored and chromium-wpt-export-bot committed Feb 11, 2021
1 parent d686fe7 commit f6ace0d
Showing 1 changed file with 59 additions and 0 deletions.
59 changes: 59 additions & 0 deletions resource-timing/CodingConventions.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
For [Resource Timing][1] tests, we want to have a consistent and clear coding
style. The goals of this style are to:
* Make it easier for new contributors to find their way around
* Help improve readability and maintainability
* Help us understand which parts of the spec are tested or not
Lots of the following rules are arbitrary but the value is realized in
consistency instead of adhering to the 'perfect' style.

We want the test suite to be navigable. Developers should be able to easily
find the file or test that is relevant to their work.
* Tests should be arranged in files according to which piece of the spec they
test
* Files should be named using a consistent pattern
* HTML files should include useful meta tags
* `<title>` for controlling labels in results pages
* `<link rel="help">` to point at the relevant piece of the spec

We want the test suite to run consistently. Flaky tests are counterproductive.
* Prefer `promise_test` to `async_test`
* Note that there’s [still potential for some concurrency][2]; use
`add_cleanup()` if needed

We want the tests to be readable. Tests should be written in a modern style
with recurring patterns.
* 80 character line limits where we can
* Consistent use of anonymous functions
* prefer
```
fn(param => {
body();
});
```

over

```
fn(function(param) {
body();
});
```

* Prefer `const` (or, if needed, `let`) to `var`
* Contain use of ‘.sub’ in filenames to known helper utilities where possible
* E.g. prefer use of get-host-info.sub.js to `{{host}}` or `{{ports[0]}}`
expressions
* Avoid use of webperftestharness[extension].js as it’s a layer of cognitive
overhead between test content and test intent
* Helper .js files are still encouraged where it makes sense but we want
to avoid a testing framework that is specific to Resource Timing (or
web performance APIs, in general).
* Prefer [`fetch_tests_from_window`][3] to collect test results from embedded
iframes instead of hand-rolled `postMessage` approaches
* Where possible, we want tests to be scalable - adding another test case
should be as simple as calling the tests with new parameters, rather than
copying an existing test and modifying it.

[1]: https://www.w3.org/TR/resource-timing-2/
[2]: https://web-platform-tests.org/writing-tests/testharness-api.html#promise-tests
[3]: https://web-platform-tests.org/writing-tests/testharness-api.html#consolidating-tests-from-other-documents

0 comments on commit f6ace0d

Please sign in to comment.