Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reland "[TablesNG] Fix OOF static-position of empty baseline-aligned table-cells" #28943

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 10, 2021

Conversation

chromium-wpt-export-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@chromium-wpt-export-bot chromium-wpt-export-bot commented May 10, 2021

This is a reland of 75216ac41d2da077f3ae3a0ca992ee3e03a937a8

This was reverted in:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2882605

"Reason for revert: Suspected to cause layout test failure on mac11"

However these were pre-existing layout test failures, and were present
on the mac11 bot after reverting, see:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/ci/Mac11%20Tests/668

Original change's description:

[TablesNG] Fix OOF static-position of empty baseline-aligned table-cells

Alignment typically does affect the static-position of any
OOF-positioned children inside of a table-cell. However when we are
baseline-aligned, we should only apply the adjustment if we have
inflow children.

This doesn't shift the OOF-positioned children if we have no inflow
children.

Bug: 1206654
Change-Id: I54e80831148407797354157d2c0d19afbb2a7858
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2880809
Commit-Queue: Ian Kilpatrick <ikilpatrick@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aleks Totic <atotic@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#880652}

Bug: 1206654
Change-Id: Ic232f57b8feba0112693385bb2ca90d7cc8164ba
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2883187
Commit-Queue: Ian Kilpatrick <ikilpatrick@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Aleks Totic <atotic@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Kilpatrick <ikilpatrick@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aleks Totic <atotic@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#881069}

Copy link
Collaborator

@wpt-pr-bot wpt-pr-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The review process for this patch is being conducted in the Chromium project.

…table-cells"

This is a reland of 75216ac41d2da077f3ae3a0ca992ee3e03a937a8

This was reverted in:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2882605

"Reason for revert: Suspected to cause layout test failure on mac11"

However these were pre-existing layout test failures, and were present
on the mac11 bot after reverting, see:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/ci/Mac11%20Tests/668

Original change's description:
> [TablesNG] Fix OOF static-position of empty baseline-aligned table-cells
>
> Alignment typically does affect the static-position of any
> OOF-positioned children inside of a table-cell. However when we are
> baseline-aligned, we should only apply the adjustment if we have
> *inflow* children.
>
> This doesn't shift the OOF-positioned children if we have no inflow
> children.
>
> Bug: 1206654
> Change-Id: I54e80831148407797354157d2c0d19afbb2a7858
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2880809
> Commit-Queue: Ian Kilpatrick <ikilpatrick@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Aleks Totic <atotic@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#880652}

Bug: 1206654
Change-Id: Ic232f57b8feba0112693385bb2ca90d7cc8164ba
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2883187
Commit-Queue: Ian Kilpatrick <ikilpatrick@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Aleks Totic <atotic@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Kilpatrick <ikilpatrick@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aleks Totic <atotic@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#881069}
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants