Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tagged Services #69

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 29, 2018
Merged

Tagged Services #69

merged 1 commit into from Jan 29, 2018

Conversation

Spomky
Copy link
Member

@Spomky Spomky commented Jan 18, 2018 •
edited

Fixes #66

Q A
Branch? master
Bug fix? no
New feature? yes
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Fixed tickets #66
License MIT
Tests added to be done
Doc PR web-token/jwt-doc#2

@Spomky Spomky added the feature label Jan 18, 2018
@Spomky Spomky added this to the Version 1.1.0 milestone Jan 18, 2018
@Spomky Spomky self-assigned this Jan 18, 2018
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 86.173% when pulling 49b4958 on TaggedServices into 8244cbe on master.

@Spomky Spomky mentioned this pull request Jan 19, 2018
Merged
@Spomky Spomky merged commit df44e55 into master Jan 29, 2018
@Spomky Spomky deleted the TaggedServices branch January 29, 2018 20:33
@Spomky Spomky restored the TaggedServices branch January 29, 2018 20:35
Spomky added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2018
@Spomky
Revert "Tagged Services (#69)"
9fc7915 
This reverts commit df44e55.
@Spomky Spomky mentioned this pull request Jan 29, 2018
Merged
Spomky added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2018
@Spomky
Revert "Tagged Services" (#74)
47b2e66 
* Tagged Services (#69)
@Spomky Spomky deleted the TaggedServices branch January 29, 2018 20:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@Spomky Spomky

Labels
feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Version 1.1.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@Spomky @coveralls