refactor: scripts #1984
refactor: scripts #1984
Conversation
| "build:client:index": "webpack ./client-src/default/index.js -o client/index.bundle.js --color --config client-src/default/webpack.config.js", | ||
| "build:client:live": "webpack ./client-src/live/index.js -o client/live.bundle.js --color --config client-src/live/webpack.config.js", | ||
| "build:client:sockjs": "webpack ./client-src/sockjs/index.js -o client/sockjs.bundle.js --color --config client-src/sockjs/webpack.config.js", | ||
| "build:client": "rimraf ./client/* && npm-run-all -s -l -p \"build:client:**\"", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- We don't extract
rmscripts because it doesn't have sense, nobody will be used their separate likenpm run rm:ssl - We use
build:clientbecause we should migrate onbabelin next major release for server, so we have these commands:
npm run build:client - build client
npm run build:server - build server (in next major release when we migrate on babel)
npm run build - build client and server
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why do you use babel at the server? we support Node6, 4, etc..?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using all the features ES like async/await (already supported in node@8), private fields, import/export and etc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is not high priority but will be great to have consistent ecma 2018/2019 code in client and server
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ok, I hope to want to use typescript.😉 I need types..lol
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I thought Node 6 was being dropped so we could use async/await, etc. without problems?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes ESM is not supported, it doesn't matter if we only use babel or typescript we will build server so i rename this command, approve?
alexander-akait
force-pushed
the
refactor-scripts
branch
from
b5f885e
to
c045795
Compare
|
Sometimes our tests are freeze we need investigate this |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1984 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 92.27% 92.27%
=======================================
Files 28 28
Lines 1075 1075
Branches 322 322
=======================================
Hits 992 992
Misses 79 79
Partials 4 4Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
For Bugs and Features; did you add new tests?
no required
Motivation / Use-Case
refactor
Breaking Changes
no
Additional Info
no