New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
User should not configure anything other than the complexity options #164
Comments
See |
Closed by a misclick. |
That's will force me to not use This linter is good, very good in comparison with naked flake8 or even with flake8 with plugins. But several rules are very opinionated. And it's good I can disable them, just a few. |
This is not the point of this issue, I am only talking about configuration options like It is not related to |
Ah, that's ok =) |
For It is safe, since any custom defined options will take priority over these values. If they will change the format (I am quite sure that they won't), we can just fix the version of The only thing I care about is where should we patch it. I guess that we should do it in the import time. I hope that |
The obvious problem with patching I will look into plugin system of |
I guess we have found a solution: https://github.com/andreoliwa/nitpick |
I'm glad |
We should provide default options for
isort
andflake8
.Related:
settings-path
option support gforcada/flake8-isort#63The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: