Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use new Streams algorithm and mixins #224

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 15, 2020
Merged

Use new Streams algorithm and mixins #224

merged 8 commits into from
Sep 15, 2020

Conversation

domenic
Copy link
Member

@domenic domenic commented Aug 27, 2020

@domenic domenic added the do not merge yet Pull request must not be merged per rationale in comment label Aug 27, 2020
@domenic domenic requested review from annevk and ricea August 27, 2020 20:07
Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I really like leaning into IDL more heavily for doing the promise wrapping. I should do that more often.


<li><p>Set <a>this</a>'s <a for=GenericTransformStream>transform</a> to <var>transform</var>.
<li><p>Set <a>this</a>'s <a for=GenericTransformStream>transform</a> to the result of
<a for=TransformStream>creating</a> a {{TransformStream}} with
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
<a for=TransformStream>creating</a> a {{TransformStream}} with
<a for=TransformStream>creating</a> a {{TransformStream}} object with

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This mismatches the algorithm declaration, which does not include "object".

encoding.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
domenic and others added 2 commits September 8, 2020 14:16
Co-authored-by: Andreu Botella <abb@randomunok.com>
@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Sep 8, 2020

I rebased this and pushed some nits and corrected things that seemed wrong. Still needs upstream changes to merge.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ricea ricea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@domenic
Copy link
Member Author

domenic commented Sep 14, 2020

Thank you for catching those; your changes LGTM. Will work on getting upstream working now.

@domenic
Copy link
Member Author

domenic commented Sep 14, 2020

The Streams PR is merged; once the link databases update let's re-run CI and see if this works.

@annevk annevk merged commit 0ca7c4e into master Sep 15, 2020
@annevk annevk deleted the streams-integration branch September 15, 2020 09:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do not merge yet Pull request must not be merged per rationale in comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants