Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use "isomorphic decode" explicitly for Refresh headers #3924

Closed
domenic opened this issue Aug 15, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

Use "isomorphic decode" explicitly for Refresh headers #3924

domenic opened this issue Aug 15, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
clarification Standard could be clearer good first issue Ideal for someone new to a WHATWG standard or software project topic: navigation

Comments

@domenic
Copy link
Member

domenic commented Aug 15, 2018 •
edited

https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#navigating-across-documents

Let value be the value of the header with each byte mapped to a code point of equal value.

We can replace this by

Let value be the isomorphic decoding of the value of the header.
@domenic domenic added clarification Standard could be clearer good first issue Ideal for someone new to a WHATWG standard or software project topic: navigation labels Aug 15, 2018
@domenic domenic changed the title Use "ASCII decode" explicitly for Refresh headers Use "isomorphic decode" explicitly for Refresh headers Aug 15, 2018
@irrationalRock irrationalRock mentioned this issue Aug 18, 2018
Merged
annevk pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2018
@irrationalRock @annevk
Editorial: use "isomorphic decode" for Refresh header steps
bef6f78 
Fixes #3924.
mustaqahmed pushed a commit to mustaqahmed/html that referenced this issue Feb 15, 2019
@irrationalRock @mustaqahmed
Editorial: use "isomorphic decode" for Refresh header steps
5a10883 
Fixes whatwg#3924.
mustaqahmed pushed a commit to mustaqahmed/html that referenced this issue Feb 15, 2019
@irrationalRock @mustaqahmed
Editorial: use "isomorphic decode" for Refresh header steps
413538b 
Fixes whatwg#3924.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
clarification Standard could be clearer good first issue Ideal for someone new to a WHATWG standard or software project topic: navigation
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@domenic