-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do <td>
elements inside a <thead>
get automagically promoted to act like <th>
#8650
Comments
<td>
elements inside a <thead>
get automagically promoted to <th>
<td>
elements inside a <thead>
get automagically promoted to act like <th>
Anything we can do to help facilitate this discussion and get an outcome? |
Returning to this dangling thread ... I believe the situation touched on in w3c/html#819 is still handwaved/unresolved here. I think it would be worth to unambiguously work out if
or if there is no such intention of implicitly "upgrading" a |
-1 from me, it is not uncommon the have a |
@stevefaulkner so -1 meaning "the phrasing in the spec should be reworded to give more nuance", i assume... |
seems like this could be updated to say something like:
the first example provided in this section uses |
Proposed a small tweak #9552 |
Picking up from an old conversation over here w3c/html#819 there seemed to be some throughs from @LJWatson that, due to the wording for the
<thead>
element https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#the-thead-element there's a clear indication/implication that a<td>
inside a<thead>
will also automagically be considered the same as a<th>
?However, if that is indeed the intention, this concept should be explicitly explained, particularly in the definition for the
<td>
element itself? https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#the-td-element/cc @chaals @stevefaulkner
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: