Use the s flag for matching ol/li's type attribute #4233
Conversation
|
There's an intent to ship against Firefox for implementing the s flag, so I suspect it's fine to use now. @NOVALISTIC could you please check how you're acknowledged? Thanks again for raising this, had a bit of an impact. 😊 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. I think we can go ahead and merge this, despite it only having one implementer committed to the underlying s feature, because this is effectively a non-normative change to the HTML standard, just rephrasing things using different mechanisms. (At least, I assume this change is not observable compared to the old prose-based mechanism.)
|
Correct, I'll give @NOVALISTIC some more time before merging though. |
|
Will merge, but @NOVALISTIC, please let us know if you'd prefer a different acknowledgment! |
|
Huh, for some reason I was never notified of this. That looks good, thanks for the acknowledgement! |
Closes #4158.
/acknowledgements.html ( diff )
/rendering.html ( diff )
/semantics-other.html ( diff )