Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial: Export concepts used by Encrypted Media Extensions #6242

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

saschanaz
Copy link
Member

@saschanaz saschanaz commented Dec 22, 2020

The list includes:

  • media resource
  • media data
  • blocked media element
  • potentially playing
  • direction of playback
  • At least two implementers are interested (and none opposed): N/A
  • Tests are written and can be reviewed and commented upon at: N/A
  • Implementation bugs are filed: N/A

(See WHATWG Working Mode: Changes for more details.)


馃挜 Error: Wattsi server error 馃挜

PR Preview failed to build. (Last tried on Jan 15, 2021, 8:00 AM UTC).

More

PR Preview relies on a number of web services to run. There seems to be an issue with the following one:

馃毃 Wattsi Server - Wattsi Server is the web service used to build the WHATWG HTML spec.

馃敆 Related URL

Parsing MDN data...
Parsing...



If you don't have enough information above to solve the error by yourself (or to understand to which web service the error is related to, if any), please file an issue.

The list includes:

* media resource
* media data
* blocked media element
* potentially playing
* direction of playback
@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Jan 4, 2021

How does the layering work with EME? I'm not sure a clean integration was ever attempted here.

Base automatically changed from master to main January 15, 2021 07:58
@chrisn
Copy link
Member

chrisn commented Mar 20, 2024

We're currently updating the EME spec in the Media WG, so would like to reference these definitions. Is there anything we need to do to for this PR to be ready to merge?

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Mar 22, 2024

Having some kind of answer to my question would be good. As well as if the layering is still lacking some idea of how we might address that going forward.

Someone will also have to rebase this it seems (or create a new PR).

@joeyparrish
Copy link

Having some kind of answer to my question would be good. As well as if the layering is still lacking some idea of how we might address that going forward.

Anne, can you help educate us on layering or help us with links to educate ourselves? My experience in spec-world is limited.

The naive answer would seem to be that EME layers on top of HTML video, and to that end, we need these definitions exported so we can refer to them properly from the EME spec.

I'm only looking at this from the point of view of EME & HTML video. Are you asking us to consider layering anything else in specific in relation to these?

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants