Define algorithm for serializing a site #7251
Conversation
Derived from the [serialization of an origin](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/origin.html#ascii-serialisation-of-an-origin).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems reasonable and per #7250 the motivation seems OK. I don't know if the Attribution Reporting API has multi-implementer interest, but my inclination (unless other editors disagree) is that for these kind of base primitives, it's usually OK to expose them even if their only consumer is a single-implementer spec.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One problem with this notation is that you need to know from context that it is a site. I think that's okay, but we should make note of it. Perhaps in a warning at the bottom?
(I also see that Infra might not support indexing syntax for tuples, but I'd consider that to be a bug. I'm pretty sure we already use that in places.)
|
@apasel422 thanks, I think you might have missed my more general review comment? |
See whatwg/html#7251 for context.
Thanks, updated. Please take a look. |
See whatwg/html#7251 for context.
Derived from the serialization of an origin.
Fixes #7250.
(See WHATWG Working Mode: Changes for more details.)
/acknowledgements.html ( diff )
/origin.html ( diff )