Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make it more like a spec, less like a GitHub README #62

Closed
domenic opened this issue Jan 23, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

Make it more like a spec, less like a GitHub README #62

domenic opened this issue Jan 23, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@domenic
Copy link
Member

domenic commented Jan 23, 2014

Work on this is proceeding in the official-lookin branch, using the template of other WHATWG specs.

Currently I'm only committing the "source" file, without running it through Anolis, because (a) committing built files to the repository seems lame; (b) I can't get that crazy Anolis toolchain running on my poor little Windows box. In leiu of that, we can use http://anolis.hoppipolla.co.uk/ to get auto-built versions, e.g. this one. Longer term I'm not sure what the right solution is.

Right now I'm mainly working on paring down the non-normative text and examples into a reasonable subset. I'll tackle the actual algorithms and class definitions after that.

I'm opening this bug to surface the fact that this is being worked on and so people can easily get to the appropriate preview link for the built version of official-lookin, and so that I can update the bug as I make substantial updates to the branch. I'd also love to use this bug as a place for people to give feedback on how to write things better as a spec.

@domenic
Copy link
Member Author

domenic commented Jun 16, 2014

Some work going on in the bikeshed branch, including auto-building and deploying to gh-pages upon push. Will merge into master soon.

@domenic
Copy link
Member Author

domenic commented Oct 6, 2014

@domenic domenic closed this as completed Oct 6, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant