Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Distributional Measures Constraints Example Notebook #440

Merged

Conversation

MilenaTrajanoska
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Created distributional measures example notebook with a data science use case

General Checklist

  • Tests added for this feature/bug
    if it was a bug, test must cover it.
  • Conform by the style guides, by using formatter
  • Documentation updated
  • (optional) Please add a label to your PR

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 15, 2022

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1848070507

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall first build on dev/loka/distributional_measures_constraints_example at 82.601%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1846849505: 82.6%
Covered Lines: 4745
Relevant Lines: 5596

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Contributor

@jamie256 jamie256 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Tagging Bernease to take a look and we can iterate.

@jamie256 jamie256 merged commit efb6105 into mainline Feb 15, 2022
@jamie256 jamie256 deleted the dev/loka/distributional_measures_constraints_example branch February 15, 2022 21:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants