WFCORE-6808 Add capability-resolving variant of child ServiceTarget-based ServiceInstaller.Builder

[pferraro]

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFCORE-6808

[yersan]

@pferraro even for simple refactorings, I would say we should have them properly tracked in a valid Jira that, in a nutshell, explains the motivation/reason of the refactor. That would help to understand the change and track it down in the future.

What's your opinion about that?

[pferraro]

WFCORE-6808 is the motivation for relocating this implementation. I'll update the commit message to make that more explicit.

[yersan]

@pferraro WFCORE-6808 or WFCORE-6806 (linked to this PR)? there are two commits, could you fix the message on both of them?

If this PR is for two Jiras I would expect:

• two Jira links on the PR description
• two Jira IDs in the PR title
• each commit message with its Jira ID in the commit message.

[pferraro]

There is only 1 jira - but I pasted the wrong link in the PR description. :/ Fixed.

[wildfly-ci]

Core -> WildFly Preview Integration Build 13581 outcome was UNKNOWN using a merge of d29d722
Summary: Canceled (Error while applying patch; cannot find commit 848df8e in the https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core.git repository, possible reason: refs/pull/5985/merge branch was updated and the commit selected for the ... Build time: 00:00:27

[wildfly-ci]

Core -> Full Integration Build 13785 outcome was UNKNOWN using a merge of d29d722
Summary: Canceled (Error while applying patch; cannot find commit 848df8e in the https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core.git repository, possible reason: refs/pull/5985/merge branch was updated and the commit selected for the ... Build time: 00:00:17

[wildfly-ci]

Core -> Full Integration Build 13526 outcome was UNKNOWN using a merge of d29d722
Summary: Canceled (Error while applying patch; cannot find commit 848df8e in the https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core.git repository, possible reason: refs/pull/5985/merge branch was updated and the commit selected for the ... Build time: 00:00:20

[yersan]

@pferraro Would you agree by squashing both commits or adding the WFCORE-6808 Jira ID to the first commit?

That would help to follow up on the changes in the future. Having a single commit without Jira ID makes finding the Jira that caused the change more difficult.

We recommend that each commit has the Jira ID on its message and I think it is a good practice even for simple refactorings.

[pferraro]

Done.

[yersan]

Thanks @pferraro