New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WFCORE-805 Add capabilty information to ResourceDefinition / MRR #909
Conversation
1a7f686
to
f19abfb
Compare
Core - Full Integration Build 1375 is now running using a merge of f19abfb |
Linux Build 2239 is now running using a merge of f19abfb |
Windows Build 1764 is now running using a merge of f19abfb |
Core - Full Integration Build 1375 outcome was FAILURE using a merge of f19abfb Build problems:Process exited with code 1 |
Windows Build 1764 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of f19abfb |
Linux Build 2239 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of f19abfb |
/** | ||
* Returns capability definition for this resource. | ||
* | ||
* @return RuntimeCapability if any registered otherwise null |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will not return null but may return an empty set.
The javadoc should use plural forms; it doesn't return a single capability.
Other than the 2 comments, looks good. |
f19abfb
to
581ccf2
Compare
fixed the PR based on the comments. |
Core - Full Integration Build 1379 is now running using a merge of 581ccf2 |
Linux Build 2243 is now running using a merge of 581ccf2 |
Windows Build 1768 is now running using a merge of 581ccf2 |
Core - Full Integration Build 1379 outcome was FAILURE using a merge of 581ccf2 Build problems:Process exited with code 1 |
581ccf2
to
3675a20
Compare
* | ||
* @param resourceRegistration a {@link ManagementResourceRegistration} created from this definition | ||
*/ | ||
default void registerCapabilities(final ManagementResourceRegistration resourceRegistration){ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just heads up, this is default method just so wildfly full code wont get angry.
Windows Build 1768 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 3675a20 |
Linux Build 2243 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 3675a20 |
Windows Build 1769 is now running using a merge of 3675a20 |
Linux Build 2244 is now running using a merge of 3675a20 |
Core - Full Integration Build 1380 is now running using a merge of 3675a20 |
Windows Build 1769 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 3675a20 |
Linux Build 2244 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 3675a20 |
Core - Full Integration Build 1383 is now running using a merge of 3675a20 |
Assuming the tests come out ok, this looks good. |
tests should be fine, the previous two full had 4 failed tests as result of hanged processes on agent. (agent has been rebooted since) |
Ah, ok that explains why I saw the same 4 failures on a couple other runs. Thanks. |
Core - Full Integration Build 1383 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 3675a20 |
WFCORE-805 Add capabilty information to ResourceDefinition / MRR
JBEAP-20064 Add PR template to include PR-processor hints
No description provided.