WFCORE-835 remove adding 'allowed' in ObjectListAttributeDefinition a… #911
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…s they that info is already present on value-type
|
Linux Build 2247 is now running using a merge of d023c18 |
|
Core - Full Integration Build 1384 is now running using a merge of d023c18 |
|
Windows Build 1771 is now running using a merge of d023c18 |
|
Windows Build 1771 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of d023c18 |
|
Linux Build 2247 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of d023c18 |
|
Core - Full Integration Build 1384 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of d023c18 |
bstansberry
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2015
WFCORE-835 remove adding 'allowed' in ObjectListAttributeDefinition a…
spyrkob
pushed a commit
to spyrkob/wildfly-core
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2020
[JBEAP-19746] Upgrade JBoss logmanager to 2.1.17
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…s they that info is already present on value-type
same fix was done for ObjectTypeAttributeDefinition some time ago.