-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Defining sigma levels according to water mass properties #40
Comments
I was going to plot similar T_S plots for specifc regions around Antarctica and overlay density in the colors instead of Age. Is the script to do the binning into 3deg bins Binning_ASC_speed.py , or is there a different one that you used for the TS and Age @willaguiar ? |
Yes! (for the ASC speed). |
I wanted to bin rho so that I could overlay density on the TS diagrams you already plotted. Will use the Extracting_TS notebook then. Thank you! |
I do like the idea of not focusing specifically in the regime averages, as I think It will help point to regions of interest where there is a higher correlation + southward heat transport. Do you think it would be worth to make a line plot like that one for the mean CSHT /ASC speed too? Just so we can see if those high correlations ( e.g., around -140) align with southward transport locally? |
Update on water masses definition Last hackathon @taimoorsohail was able to produce a data with maximum and minimum densities with non-zero CSHT as f(contour, time). I updated his code to separate the AASW/CDW/DSW with the definitions we discussed before. Here are a few plots on how that looks like..... PS: We talked a lot about how we would define these waters last time, so let me know in case that is not the definition we agreed upon. Definitions are based on the 3deg binned daily output. Code for the images and definitions masks for Water mass definition are on |
So that means that we won't be able to do correlations in the DSW layer, because there are very few longitudes where the DSW layer exists at all times. This isn't a problem if we only want to focus on the CDW layer. But is problematic if we wanted to show other layers. |
But DSW is not always present around Antarctica since its formation is localised. Is that sufficient justification as to why we can't do a circumpolar correlation in the DSW layer but we can in the other layers? |
I think so... I also think we are mostly interested in the Southward CDW heat transport, so just doing circumpolar average correlations for the DSW layer (There should be no NaNs circumpolarly) should be enough ( and then we can justify any correlation with the result of Morrison et al 2020) |
I think if we stick to fixed density surfaces, this is a natural outcome of that approach. I agree, I don't see an issue with this - it will be easy to justify that DSW does not exist everywhere, and we could stick to circumpolar averages for DSW. |
Yep, agreed, I don't think it's an issue. |
Quick summary from today's meeting:
I have go ahead and binned the daily CSHT in density coordinates (from /g/data/v45/wf4500/ASC_project_files/Cross_slope_heat_transport/OM2_IAF/daily_rho/) into the 10deg longitudinal bins. The binned data can be found here: |
In the last meeting we redefine the CSHT($\sigma$ ) binned into $\sigma$ levels that reflects the water mass properties along the 1km isobath. CDW/DSW cutoff should be based in the maximum cumulative northward heat transport, while AASW/CDW should be based in a combination of maximum temperature + age from a TS diagram , taking into account a density range to classify the CDW.
This issue is for us to discuss these definitions. tasks are:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: