-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Choice of isobath for cross-slope heat transport #8
Comments
The plot shows the barotropic speed and some contours:
We decided to go with 700 m, 1000 m, 1500 m. These give a little spatial coverage without going too far on/offslope. If we find that the results vary a lot between the contours, we can still add more. |
Closed as completed. |
Except I'm not sure I edited these to remove loops outside East Antarctica?
I think these were probably for Ellen's project where we just focused on
East Antarctica. Probably good to check if there are loops that need
removing.
…On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 10:49, Wilma Huneke ***@***.***> wrote:
I realised there are already a bunch of pre-calculated contours (using
Adele's continuous definition). We have 650m, 800m, 1000m, 1500m, 2500m. I
won't recalculate them and suggest we use the 650m instead of the above
suggested 700m contour.
Here some figures of the contours with speed as background:
[image: Fig_speed_bathymetry_contours_650m_1000m_1500m]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15355753/270828139-0fbb61ea-2c7b-436b-bf80-14619db04b2f.png>
The files are under
/g/data/v45/akm157/model_data/access-om2/Antarctic_slope_contour_1000m.npz
(replace the "1000m" with "650m" or "1500m").
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACA44U5ESGH3BADAWKUM7PTX4NZYHANCNFSM6AAAAAAY6UTMIA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Oh, I see. I'll have a detailed look at the contours then. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Just occurred to me that picking the 1000m isobath to compute the heat transport across is another choice we've made in the analysis so far. Is the heat transport variability sensitive to using e.g. the 650m or 2000m isobath instead?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: