Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support for ostree systems #268

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

richm
Copy link
Collaborator

@richm richm commented Nov 17, 2023

Feature: Allow running and testing the role with ostree managed nodes.

Reason: We have users who want to use the role to manage ostree
systems.

Result: Users can use the role to manage ostree managed nodes.
Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson rmeggins@redhat.com

Feature: Allow running and testing the role with ostree managed nodes.

Reason: We have users who want to use the role to manage ostree
systems.

Result: Users can use the role to manage ostree managed nodes.
Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com>
@richm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

richm commented Nov 17, 2023

I know it's a big change - many, many small changes. One thing I could do is eliminate some of the ostree packages files for platforms that aren't really supported - I don't see many people building ostree systems for Debian, Ubuntu, etc. - then add them if there is demand.

hmm - not sure how to make the ansible checks pass - looks like just having the ansible.utils.update_fact module in the file causes parsing of the files to fail if the collection isn't available :-(

@richm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

richm commented Nov 17, 2023

looking for an alternate solution :-( I don't think this will fly with legacy role users . . .

@richm richm closed this Nov 17, 2023
@richm richm deleted the ostree branch November 17, 2023 14:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant