Update issue template #3723
Update issue template #3723
Conversation
|
Thanks Kyaa-dost for opening a Pull Request! The reviewers will test the PR and highlight if there is any conflict or changes required. If the PR is approved we will proceed to merge the pull request 🙌 |
ghost
requested review from
ghost
added
the
|
Hello @Kyaa-dost! Because this pull request has the p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (
|
|
@msftbot merge once approved by @michael-hawker 🚀 |
|
Hello @Kyaa-dost! Because you've given me some instructions on how to help merge this pull request, I'll be modifying my merge approach. Here's how I understand your requirements for merging this pull request:
If this doesn't seem right to you, you can tell me to cancel these instructions and use the auto-merge policy that has been configured for this repository. Try telling me "forget everything I just told you". |
| <!-- 🚨 Please provide detailed information and Do Not skip any instructions as they are all required and essential to help us understand the feature 🚨 --> | ||
| <!-- 🚨 PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILED INFORMATION AND DO NOT SKIP ANY INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION MENTIONED BELOW AS THEY ARE ALL REQUIRED AND ESSENTIAL TO HELP US UNDERSTAND THE FEATURE. | ||
| ... | ||
| IF NOT CERTAIN ABOUT THE FEATURE AND REQUIRE MORE CLARITY THEN PLEASE POST ON "IDEAS" CATEGORY OF THE DISCUSSIONS PLATFORM [https://github.com/windows-toolkit/WindowsCommunityToolkit/discussions/categories/ideas] WHERE YOU CAN DISCUSS AND ENAGAGE WITH THE COMMUNITY TO GAIN FURTHER CLAIRITY REGARDING THE FEATURE 🚨 --> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great idea @Kyaa-dost!
Thoughts on if we should be more explicit about starting feature requests for things like new controls explicitly in the discussions area? As we had mentioned about trying to eventually have issues just be things we know community folks or the toolkit team are working on?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@michael-hawker so you mean any in-progress or already developed feature by the community member be used as a feature request in the issues? Whereas any idea/s about a feature be opened in discussions?
Fixes #3722
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Documentation content changes
What is the current behavior?
Missing information regarding our new "Discussions" tab
What is the new behavior?
Includes information regarding "Discussions"
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
Other information