Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Parallelize downloads in .NET 4.6.1 and .NET Core bundles #367

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 6, 2020
Merged

Parallelize downloads in .NET 4.6.1 and .NET Core bundles #367

merged 1 commit into from Feb 6, 2020

Conversation

nxtn
Copy link
Contributor

@nxtn nxtn commented Jan 20, 2020

No description provided.

@nxtn nxtn closed this Jan 20, 2020
@nxtn nxtn reopened this Jan 21, 2020
@nxtn nxtn mentioned this pull request Feb 2, 2020
Merged
@oleg-nenashev oleg-nenashev changed the title Optimize Download Optimize Download speed Feb 6, 2020
oleg-nenashev
oleg-nenashev approved these changes Feb 6, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@oleg-nenashev oleg-nenashev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This week I tested it locally for .NET 4.0 and .NET Core 3.1 bundles, and it worked pretty well. .NET2.0 handling looks right as well, so I will go forward and merge it

@oleg-nenashev oleg-nenashev changed the title Optimize Download speed Parallelize downloads in .NET 4.6.1 and .NET Core bundles Feb 6, 2020
@oleg-nenashev oleg-nenashev merged commit dc10d4d into winsw:master Feb 6, 2020
@nxtn nxtn deleted the download branch February 6, 2020 10:31
@nxtn nxtn added this to the 2.6.0 milestone Mar 25, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@oleg-nenashev oleg-nenashev oleg-nenashev approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.6.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@nxtn @oleg-nenashev