Add gzipDisabled at the ResponseDefinitionBuilder level

[dkhozyainov]

Greetings, please look at my PR for #2071

• Recommended: Join WireMock Slack to get any help in #help-contributing or a project-specific channel like #wiremock-java
• Recommended: If you participate in Hacktoberfest 2023, make sure you're signed up there and in the WireMock form
• The PR request is well described and justified, including the body and the references
• The PR title represents the desired changelog entry
• The repository's code style is followed (see the contributing guide)
• Test coverage that demonstrates that the change works as expected
• For new features, there's necessary documentation in this pull request or in a subsequent PR to wiremock.org

[tomakehurst]

I'm not sure just setting the content encoding header is enough to actually disable gzip.

Would be good to see a test showing the the response is actually in plain text.

[dkhozyainov]

@tomakehurst Ok, thanks for you feedback. I tried to illustrate it in test wireMockServerWithStubForWithGzipDisabledTrue.
At the beginning I used stubFor for ordinary response, then i used stubFor with my disabled function.
As a result i saw follow logs:

If i not understood what you want to see, please can explain one more time

[tomakehurst]

OK, from your screenshot it looks like just changing the header does actually affect the body encoding, which is a bit counterintuitive but if it works...

[dkhozyainov]

@tomakehurst, Hi, I fixed comments, please review, when will you have free time

[tomakehurst]

Thanks!

Please can open a documentation PR for this at https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock.org?

[dkhozyainov]

Thanks for quick review!
Ok, I'll do it.

[dkhozyainov]

@tomakehurst Hi, I open documentation PR wiremock/wiremock.org#251