Allow matchesJsonSchema to be supplied as a json object.

[kyle-winkelman]

https://wiremock.org/docs/request-matching/#json-schema shows an example of using the matchesJsonSchema with an escaped json string:

{
  "request" : {
    "urlPath" : "/schema-match",
    "method" : "POST",
    "bodyPatterns" : [ {
      "matchesJsonSchema" : "{\n  \"type\": \"object\",\n  \"required\": [\n    \"name\"\n  ],\n  \"properties\": {\n    \"name\": {\n      \"type\": \"string\"\n    },\n    \"tag\": {\n      \"type\": \"string\"\n    }\n  }\n}",
      "schemaVersion" : "V202012"
    } ]
  },
  "response" : {
    "status" : 200
  }
}

This PR would allow us to supply a json object (similar to equalToJson). For example:

{
  "request" : {
    "urlPath" : "/schema-match",
    "method" : "POST",
    "bodyPatterns" : [ {
      "matchesJsonSchema" : {
        "type": "object",
        "required": [
          "name"
        ],
        "properties": {
          "name": {
            "type": "string"
          },
          "tag": {
            "type": "string"
          }
        }
      }
    } ]
  },
  "response" : {
    "status" : 200
  }
}

References

• Allow matchesJsonSchema to be supplied as a json object. wiremock.org#252

Submitter checklist

• Recommended: Join WireMock Slack to get any help in #help-contributing or a project-specific channel like #wiremock-java
• The PR request is well described and justified, including the body and the references
• The PR title represents the desired changelog entry
• The repository's code style is followed (see the contributing guide)
• Test coverage that demonstrates that the change works as expected
• For new features, there's necessary documentation in this pull request or in a subsequent PR to wiremock.org

[dieppa]

Thanks a lot! It looks good! From your previous comment I assume this will complemented with a PR in the documentation project.

Thanks!

[dieppa]

Hello @kyle-winkelman , once again thanks for your contribution!

Are you planning to provide the documentation on this? There is no pressure, but just for us to plan the workload.

Thanks in advance!

[kyle-winkelman]

wiremock/wiremock.org#252
Yes, I mentioned this PR, but didn't explicitly link it back here.

[dieppa]

Ah, Ok.Thanks!